News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Reliability Demands Functional Programming by jghn on Sunday December 28, 2025 @12:09PM (#46412529)
No I think your point is good, it just wasn't contradictory and I think that was your intent. Defining FP is a dark art :)
Re:Why Reliability Demands Functional Programming by agumonkey on Sunday December 28, 2025 @12:29PM (#46412696)
maybe FP should be explained as `rules not values`. in scheme it's common to negate the function to be applied, or curry some expression or partially compose / thread rules/logic to get a potential future value that did nothing yet
Re:Why Reliability Demands Functional Programming by jghn on Sunday December 28, 2025 @05:41PM (#46415269)
I like it. I think I said this in a separate post in here but I've taken to breaking it down to different archetypes and discussing them separately.