Re:Why Reliability Demands Functional Programming
by jghn on Sunday December 28, 2025 @12:09PM
(#46412529)
No I think your point is good, it just wasn't contradictory and I think that was your intent. Defining FP is a dark art :)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why Reliability Demands Functional Programming
by agumonkey on Sunday December 28, 2025 @12:29PM
(#46412696)
maybe FP should be explained as `rules not values`. in scheme it's common to negate the function to be applied, or curry some expression or partially compose / thread rules/logic to get a potential future value that did nothing yet