Re:Rob Pike Goes Nuclear over GenAI
by aurareturn on Saturday December 27, 2025 @12:36PM
(#46403483)
You are. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority
Clout? Historical importance? Feeling like people are forgetting him? If he didn't care about any of this, he wouldn't have a social media account.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Rob Pike Goes Nuclear over GenAI
by spacechild1 on Saturday December 27, 2025 @02:41PM
(#46404558)
I'm not saying that Rob is right because of his achievements. I'm only saying that your speculations in your original post are ridiculous considering Rob's career and personal situation.
> Clout? Historical importance? Feeling like people are forgetting him?
Even more speculation.
Just in case you are not aware: there are many people who really think that what the big AI companies are doing is unethical. Rob may be one of them.
Re:Rob Pike Goes Nuclear over GenAI
by aurareturn on Sunday December 28, 2025 @04:58AM
(#46409894)
Stop appealing to authority. Just argue about facts and what was said.
You also keep accusing me of speculation but I already mentioned multiple times that it’s speculation. I never said it’s not speculation. It’s you who can’t make a coherent come back argument except to tell me to research and then respect him.
Re:Rob Pike Goes Nuclear over GenAI
by spacechild1 on Monday December 29, 2025 @02:42AM
(#46418356)
It's you who didn't look up some facts before posting. Please read your original post and then tell me how it possibly relates to Rob's situation.
> You also keep accusing me of speculation but I already mentioned multiple times that it’s speculation.
Yes, you mentioned it yourself, but you don't seem to understand the problem with it.