News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Retreating from EVs could be hazardous for Western carmakers by wakawaka28 on Saturday December 27, 2025 @02:00AM (#46399773)
>Saying that Trump is not allowed to be blamed is symptomatic of just how damaged the public discourse is.

He didn't say that.

The trouble is that ALL anyone does is blame Trump, when both parties have undermined US industry for the past 50 years or so. I think there is no clear solution to keeping industry here. Protectionism often undermines competition and raises costs. But with the current monetary system, and our collective labor/wage standards, we cannot compete in the long run. We will ultimately have to resort to some protectionism for critical industries.

>Too many snowflakes who are terrified of facing basic accountability for the consequences of their beliefs and actions.

I think both of our political parties are unwilling to admit fault. Unfortunately, people like you only want to shit on Trump and Republicans.

No doubt this will get several downvotes because HN is in fact overwhelmingly populated by liberals with Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Re:Retreating from EVs could be hazardous for Western carmakers by bataowt on Saturday December 27, 2025 @02:28AM (#46399906)
Thank you.

It’s my pet theory that China and friends have been running some serious propaganda in the West which has culminated in this red vs blue vitriol that’s bordering on mindless, thought terminating cliches. I say that because they routinely get away with far worse and very few people speak up against it nevermind do something about it. The air around it is so quiet it’s as if people are siding with them (and perhaps they are).

[nb. The average Chinese person would easily point out the number of Jews as heads of prominent tech companies in the West and not flinch saying it. The average Westerner dare not even think about saying it. That’s how crippled your standing is right now.]

Blaming Trump won’t help rewind the clock, and there’s ultimately very little he’s personally responsible for in the grand scheme of things. This started decades ago and you’re up against a country that will use every dirty trick in the book, because they are playing to win.

First realize how disadvantaged you are at the moment that whatever you do, your country would stand in your way and sabotage you out of petty reasons, against a country that’s turning more and more people into millionaires and proliferating across the globe and who has softly and quietly taken key strategic economic and industrial positions at a global scale. You can blame Trump if it makes you feel better, but it won’t help you win.

Population across the globe may be dwindling, but some people have more to lose than others and still come out on top.

Re:Retreating from EVs could be hazardous for Western carmakers by jemmyw on Saturday December 27, 2025 @04:29AM (#46400476)
The global population is not dwindling yet. At the current derivative of birth rate it'll keep keep growing for 50 years. Of course many places will experience a demographic crisis well before the global population falls.
Re:Retreating from EVs could be hazardous for Western carmakers by wakawaka28 on Saturday December 27, 2025 @06:54PM (#46406802)
Many places already are in demographic crisis. "Not dwindling yet" but the fix is in. It will dwindle as soon as old people start dying.
Re:Retreating from EVs could be hazardous for Western carmakers by tomhow on Sunday December 28, 2025 @07:12AM (#46410507)
> No doubt this will get several downvotes because HN is in fact overwhelmingly populated by liberals with Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Please don't comment like this on HN. This is a place for curious conversation not fulmination and ideological battle.

Re:Retreating from EVs could be hazardous for Western carmakers by wakawaka28 on Sunday December 28, 2025 @02:55PM (#46413908)
Please don't lecture me on HN ethos and fulmination when libs do it hundreds of times every day here and their bullshit generally goes unanswered. I have in fact been downvoted many times and even after 2 years of using the site daily I can't downvote anyone myself.
Re:Retreating from EVs could be hazardous for Western carmakers by tomhow on Sunday December 28, 2025 @03:44PM (#46414313)
You've entered a community that has clear guidelines and a clearly stated purpose and you've brought an ideologically combative energy, in clear breach of the site’s guidelines and intended use. This is only a place where people want to participate because others make the effort to contribute positively and raise the standards up rather than dragging them down. People have no trouble getting to the 500-point threshold to enable downvoting when they contribute positively to the site for a few months, with interesting submissions and thoughtful comments. We have tools anyone can use to report breaches if they want to earnestly show they intend to use the site as intended – flagging and emailing us ([email protected]). We push back on anyone we see breaking the guidelines, regardless of “side” (we don't care about the side and often don't even know), and we're routinely accused of favoring the other side by people who refuse to take responsibility for their own conduct.
Re:Retreating from EVs could be hazardous for Western carmakers by wakawaka28 on Sunday December 28, 2025 @04:46PM (#46414843)
I explained my side already. The site's policies are selectively enforced by moderators and the liberal hive mind here downvotes most of my posts. Stop trying to deny what I have seen for the past 2 years here. If you think "a few months" of commenting is enough to get basic site features, you're wrong. I disagree with people often and talk straight, and there is very much a liberal hive mind here of established users who leave snarky fulminating comments on political stuff and downvotes on comments. There are also people shilling for particular technologies who downvote me too when I express an opinion they don't like. Anyway, it's clear you don't believe me or want to hold the line for your favorite views. So be it. Maybe if enough people like me complain something will change.
Re:Retreating from EVs could be hazardous for Western carmakers by tomhow on Sunday December 28, 2025 @04:56PM (#46414912)
People have made these complaints for the site’s entire history and we’re routinely characterized as being biased in favour of “the other side” by people who mistake this as being a site where “side” matters.

The people who don’t make this complaint are those who use the site as intended - for curious conversation rather than ideological battle.

Re:Retreating from EVs could be hazardous for Western carmakers by wakawaka28 on Monday December 29, 2025 @03:29AM (#46418594)
>People have made these complaints for the site’s entire history and we’re routinely characterized as being biased in favour of “the other side” by people who mistake this as being a site where “side” matters.

I get what you may aspire to have happen on this site, but it does not live up to those ideals. Probably thousands of people, sock puppets, and bots brigade in favor of their own opinions, regardless of what the rules say. The only people who will really feel left out by this are the ones like myself who don't agree "enough" with the hive mind. I would care a lot less if basic features of the site were not gated by points, as well. Half of the time I feel like I wandered into Reddit.

I reckon that the people who don't make this complaint are the ones who just agree with the hive mind and don't suffer downvotes. I know for a fact I could simply state the exact opposite of what I do in many cases, in the same abrasive style, and get at least neutral treatment. You won't even let my honest constructive criticism here go without downvotes. You aren't the least bit curious what normal users like me go through. You want to prescribe a view of my experience according to your own imagination.

Re:Retreating from EVs could be hazardous for Western carmakers by tomhow on Tuesday December 30, 2025 @08:12PM (#46440200)
You're expressing some pain about the situation you're in and I don't want to diminish that. I know very well that it's difficult feeling like you're a lone figure against a mob who are opposed to what you believe in, and that those in power are biased in favour of the mob.

The thing is, everyone feels like that when they are strongly committed to a particular ideology. Dang has written several times about the "notice-dislike bias" [1], in which you notice more strongly the views you most dislike, and feel like the environment is dominated by those views. We know that effect is real by the fact that we are routinely accused of “putting our thumb on the scale” in favour of the present US administration or in support of the politics favoured by Silicon Valley power brokers, which we don't do and which we know very well would destroy HN (and thus, our jobs) if we did.

Dang and I have been doing this job in some form for many years and we know more than anything else that the only way to keep HN thriving is to make it a place where all reasonable points of view can be shared and discussed. Yes, the community's ideology skews moderately left-libertarian, which you would expect of a community dominated by technology industry employees. But several of the biggest figures on leader board are notable for espousing conservative/libertarian positions, and we always want the spectrum of views to represented here, otherwise there'd be little to discuss.

Addressing some of your key points:

> I get what you may aspire to have happen on this site, but it does not live up to those ideals

Nothing in life ever lives up to ideals :) We can only try and push things in the right direction. The outcome will always be messy and imperfect, and we can only ever hope to make it less imperfect than it would be without our interventions. We think we get things about right if we're criticized roughly equally from either side.

> Probably thousands of people, sock puppets, and bots brigade in favor of their own opinions, regardless of what the rules say

We've become pretty good at detecting these and killing their posts; it's surprisingly easy to detect manipulation once you've spent enough time reading all the threads and knowing what authentic discussion looks like.

> The only people who will really feel left out by this are the ones like myself who don't agree "enough" with the hive mind.

> I would care a lot less if basic features of the site were not gated by points, as well.

We have to have some way of determining that people are committed to contributing positively to the community before unlocking privileges that influence what gets seen on the site.

> Half of the time I feel like I wandered into Reddit.

People have been saying this since 2007 :)

> I reckon that the people who don't make this complaint are the ones who just agree with the hive mind and don't suffer downvotes

No, plenty of people take pride in being at odds with the majority. They accept that they're going to get downvotes and accept them with a little pride.

That said, we don't like to see unfair voting on HN, and any time you feel a comment has been unfairly downvoted, you're welcome to email us ([email protected]) to point it out and we can look into it.

[1] https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...