News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ChatGPT conversations still lack timestamps after years o... by rdiddly on Friday December 26, 2025 @12:23PM (#46394106)
It's all rather dumb, but your examples are really counterexamples, because a watt is sadly not something most people understand. One would at minimum need to have passed a physics class, and even that doesn't necessarily leave a person with an intuitive, visceral understanding of what a watt is, feels like, can do. I appreciate my older Samsung phone that just converts it into expected time until full charge. That's the number that matters to me anyway, and I can make my own value judgment about how "super" the fastness is. But I do agree with your point and would be pissed if they dumbed it down to Later, Soon, Very Soon and Super Soon.

Speaking of time and timestamps, which I would've thought were straightforward, I get irked to see them dumbed-down to "ago" values e.g. an IM sent "10 minutes ago" or worse "a day ago." Like what time of day, a day ago?

Re:ChatGPT conversations still lack timestamps after years o... by 201984 on Friday December 26, 2025 @12:48PM (#46394326)
Most people can understand "bigger number better". They don't need the full theoretical derivation of the watt as a unit of power for that.
Re:ChatGPT conversations still lack timestamps after years o... by Izkata on Friday December 26, 2025 @06:41PM (#46397596)
And just through exposure over time they'd learn "my phone usually charges around X" and be able to see if their new cable is actually charging faster or not.