Re:Rob Pike Goes Nuclear over GenAI
by csomar on Friday December 26, 2025 @03:22AM
(#46390280)
According to the parent, the platform gives the content creator the choice/control. So no, it's not garbage and that's the correct way to go about it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Rob Pike Goes Nuclear over GenAI
by bangaladore on Friday December 26, 2025 @04:21AM
(#46390548)
Disagree. It gives the user the illusion that the purpose is to protect them somehow, but in reality it is solely there to be anti-user and pro lock in to social media walled gardens.
It's also a way to prevent LLMs to get trained on their data without their consent.
Re:Rob Pike Goes Nuclear over GenAI
by danabramov on Friday December 26, 2025 @04:48AM
(#46390697)
That's not correct.
The setting is mostly cosmetic and only affects the Bluesky official app and web interface. People do find this setting helpful for curbing external waves of harassment (less motivated people just won't bother making an account), but the data is public and is available on the AT protocol: https://pdsls.dev/at://robpike.io/app.bsky.feed.post/3matwg6...
So nothing is stopping LLMs from training on that data per se.
That's assuming that AI companies are gathering data in a smart way. The entire MusicBrainz database can be downloaded for free but AI scrapers are still attempting to scrape it one HTML page at a time, which often leads into the service having errors and/or slowdowns.
Re:Rob Pike Goes Nuclear over GenAI
by danabramov on Saturday December 27, 2025 @08:36AM
(#46401758)
Yea that’s true. I’m just saying if someone wants to put in a modicum of effort, AT ecosystem is highly scrapable by design. In fact apps themselves (like Bluesky) are essentially scrapers.