News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Jeff Atwood works by frou_dh on Wednesday October 10, 2012 @05:04PM (#4638180)
Atwood seems to have a penchant for stating half-baked opinions very forcefully.

Todo systems are not just for important things. They're also for mundane things. A few examples from my own:

- Get the share of that £xxx bill from a housemate.

- Every Tuesday and Friday: Move trash kerbside.

- At least weekly: Process any unopened postal mail I have sitting around.

- At least monthly: Check my online bank and scan for any unexpected transactions.

Why on earth shouldn't things like these be stored and optionally teed up by a system?

Re:How Jeff Atwood works by shanselman on Wednesday October 10, 2012 @06:03PM (#4638436)
Re:How Jeff Atwood works by jsdalton on Wednesday October 10, 2012 @05:23PM (#4638268)
The counterargument is that all of these tasks are better suited for a calendar rather than an open-ended to-do list.
Re:How Jeff Atwood works by kamaal on Thursday October 11, 2012 @03:33AM (#4639875)
A calendar is basically a meta to-do list with reminders and deadlines.

Most people using calendars for this purpose don't realize that they are actually using to-do lists.

Re:How Jeff Atwood works by frou_dh on Wednesday October 10, 2012 @05:37PM (#4638345)
If I'm managing tasks, I'd rather use a UI designed for managing tasks (whether they be scheduled/due or not).

The point is that it's easy to dismiss the usefulness of todo systems if you characterise them as a manual-append-only-bucketlists. But unless you're Doing It Wrong, or using a terrible one, that's simply not the case.

Re:How Jeff Atwood works by sadga on Wednesday October 10, 2012 @05:18PM (#4638243)
> - Every Tuesday and Friday: Move trash kerbside.

Oh crap, I forgot to do this yesterday!