News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Adobe Photoshop 1.0 Source Code (2013) by jibal on Wednesday December 24, 2025 @04:53PM (#46379661)
> Your claim that I'm bad faith is itself bad-faith.

His claim is itself of course more bad faith, and his entire comment is extreme bad faith -- "weasel liar"? "all you do here"? Irrelevant demands for a definition that everyone already knows? It's bad faith all the way down. Oh well, some people are irredeemably awful.

Re:Adobe Photoshop 1.0 Source Code (2013) by phendrenad2 on Thursday December 25, 2025 @10:03AM (#46384798)
Did you find that dictionary yet?
Re:Adobe Photoshop 1.0 Source Code (2013) by jibal on Friday December 26, 2025 @12:00AM (#46389348)
> Did you find that dictionary yet?

Typical of the sort of comment that irredeemably awful people make. At no point did I say anything that can be rationally construed as being at odds with the dictionary definition of "antonym". This troll trash implied that I had without any basis, when all I said is that "closed source" can be arbitrarily defined as being the antonym of "open source" -- which is a tautology, independent of the actual meaning of "antonym" (but clearly consistent with it).