Yikes, I just did. Trivializing the holocaust in Germany of all places is not a good look.
Edit: This is exclusively based on the primary source - a book cover where the guy was using a swastika (!!!) to critise a policy he didn't like - i.e. made light of the holocaust. If you don't understand why that's completely unacceptable, I don't know what to tell you.
I'll help you out one last time since you seem to be somewhat trying...maybe https://off-guardian.org/2024/10/01/guilty
Cj hopkins is just one example, there are many more.
Edit: ok. You no longer are arguing in good faith, you clearly just have an agenda and will twist whatever I present to you to further that agenda. Can't have a good faith debate with someone who lacks principles. One cover trivializing the Holocaust and the other... Doesn't... Because it suits my narrative. It's just so scummy. Anyway, you've camped this thread and posted more then anyone else here, so maybe I shouldn't have been surprised.
It's one thing to use something for documentary purposes or in art. It's another to use it to make light of the holocaust like this guy did. It's all clearly written in our law.
If that person didn't want to follow our law, why did he come here? Why do we have to bother with criminal immigrants that don't want to integrate into our way of life?
The federal reserve isn't known as especially democratic.
Only people being dishonest are those who ignore massive speech restrictions in europe. Look up cj Hopkins. I could go on and on and on. Sadly my comment likely to never even be seen because of how aggressive hn is whenever there's any intelligent push back to the progressive/liberal agenda.
Edit. If your takeaway aftertwo minute search on cj hopkins is lol Nazis are bad, then you have much more profound problems with research and basic understanding of reality then I can assist you with. Try going through the actual court documents and primary sources for once in your life instead of just letting whichever source of truth you trust to propagandize you.