Re:Show HN: The Whicher: A/B test the Real World
by jiaaro on Wednesday October 10, 2012 @11:49AM
(#4636844)
I agree that sample size is important and that's why you still need 200+ responses.
It's a hybrid between a survey and an A/B test. You ask a question, but you get to find out about more than just the one variation that the person is served up.
I think it's fair to say that there is more info to be gathered from each individual than time-on-page, scroll behavior, and converted-or-didnt
If you like, you can think of this as a way to get more resolution from a survey-typed question
Secondly a lot of what A/B testing gets at is subconscious reaction, not conscious reactions. Consciously when we're asked a question and are paying attention, we are poor judges of how we're going to react to, say, a larger button to click on. But when we're actually using the site, we notice and hit the larger button.
And thirdly, if you're actually going to seek out a small sample of people for detailed information capture, do it in person. I can't stress this enough. If you think up questions in a vacuum it is hard to ask the right questions. That is part of what makes A/B testing so frustrating. But if you have a conversation and are observant, you'll quickly generate good ideas.