Re:State regulators vote to keep utility profits high angeri...
by aidenn0 on Monday December 22, 2025 @05:32PM
(#46359970)
If the government has to approve expenditures and profit margins, there seems to be little reason for a private utility to exist?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:State regulators vote to keep utility profits high angeri...
by danans on Monday December 22, 2025 @06:10PM
(#46360337)
Without the private sector utility company, there wouldn't be a mechanism to raise funds from and pay profits to shareholders.
Re:State regulators vote to keep utility profits high angeri...
by xboxnolifes on Monday December 22, 2025 @06:16PM
(#46360391)
Sure there would be; raise funds: tax, pay profits: reduce tax / tax breaks. The real differentiator is in the ability to choose who your shareholders are with less scrutiny.
Re:State regulators vote to keep utility profits high angeri...
by danans on Tuesday December 23, 2025 @12:10AM
(#46362612)
I tend to agree, but that's a collective decision and action problem, which we have difficulty with as a society today.
Re:State regulators vote to keep utility profits high angeri...
by dragonwriter on Tuesday December 23, 2025 @03:05AM
(#46363389)
There is very little reason for private utilities to exist in California, especially PG&E (none of them are great, but PG*E is especially bad), which keeps funding lavishly to lobby against expansion of public utility coverage areas, committing homicide, and going bankrupt only to be resurrected in an endless cycle of nonsense.