News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Guide to Local Coding Models by jgalt212 on Monday December 22, 2025 @10:40AM (#46354994)
I will use a local coding model for our proprietary / trade secrets internal code when Google uses Claude for its internal code and Microsoft starts using Gemini for internal code.

The flip side of this coin is I'd be very excited if Jane Street or DE Shaw were running their trading models through Claude. Then I'd have access to billions of dollars of secrets.

Re:A Guide to Local Coding Models by Aurornis on Monday December 22, 2025 @11:08AM (#46355269)
> I'd be very excited if Jane Street or DE Shaw were running their trading models through Claude. Then I'd have access to billions of dollars of secrets.

Using Claude for inference does not mean the codebase gets pulled into their training set.

This is a tired myth that muddies up every conversation about LLMs

Re:A Guide to Local Coding Models by jgalt212 on Monday December 22, 2025 @11:21AM (#46355423)
> This is a tired myth that muddies up every conversation about LLMs

Many copyright holders, and the courts would beg to differ.

Re:A Guide to Local Coding Models by bilater on Monday December 22, 2025 @11:31AM (#46355551)
lol yeah its weird to me why even ppl on HN can't wrap their heads around stateless calls.
Re:A Guide to Local Coding Models by jgalt212 on Monday December 22, 2025 @12:39PM (#46356403)
unless you control both the client and the server, you cannot prove a call is stateless.