Rue: Higher level than Rust, lower level than Go

Re:Rue: Higher level than Rust, lower level than Go by Panzerschrek on Monday December 22, 2025 @01:24AM (#46351859)

I am surprised that a language with nothing than a couple of promises gets so much attention. Why exactly?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rue: Higher level than Rust, lower level than Go by squirrellous on Monday December 22, 2025 @06:05AM (#46353167)

IIRC the author has a good track record with programming languages.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rue: Higher level than Rust, lower level than Go by steveklabnik on Monday December 22, 2025 @06:47AM (#46353421)

I've been a member of this community for a long time.

People also like hearing about new languages.

I agree that it's not really ready for this much attention just yet, but that's the way of the world. We'll see how it goes.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rue: Higher level than Rust, lower level than Go by forgotpwd16 on Monday December 22, 2025 @09:14AM (#46354259)

One of which the implementation is 100% vibe coded even.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rue: Higher level than Rust, lower level than Go by barnabee on Monday December 22, 2025 @10:45AM (#46355041)

I think ~everyone wants a language that's kind of like Go with a Rusty type system (and maybe syntax), so any title like this gets attention.

There's an obvious sweet spot in there.

[ Parent | on HN ]