Re:Engineering dogmas it's time to retire
by heyitsdaad on Sunday December 21, 2025 @07:42PM
(#46350155)
Hard no buddy. Junior dev means junior code and junior judgement. Countless times we had prod issues because some dev thought the change was harmless and they didn't need review.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Engineering dogmas it's time to retire
by cloogshicer on Sunday December 21, 2025 @08:57PM
(#46350560)
In the article, they specifically exclude juniors and people who are still being onboarded.
Re:Engineering dogmas it's time to retire
by jinushaun on Sunday December 21, 2025 @09:10PM
(#46350612)
I can’t find that disclaimer in the article.
Re:Engineering dogmas it's time to retire
by AntonZ234 on Monday December 22, 2025 @08:09AM
(#46353853)
OP here.
In this one the closest is probably:
"I love the process at Pylon: engineers merge their own code and only request reviews if they need input, think they have a risky change, or are still onboarding. "
But I fully agree that for juniors it makes sense to have it mandatory.