News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Tasks: Opus 4.5 has... by nightshift1 on Sunday December 21, 2025 @02:43AM (#46343021)
>which human

The second graph has this under it:

The length of tasks (measured by how long they take human professionals) that generalist frontier model agents can complete autonomously with 50% reliability has been doubling approximately every 7 months for the last 6 years...

Re:Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Tasks: Opus 4.5 has... by twotwotwo on Sunday December 21, 2025 @03:08AM (#46343108)
Yeah--I wanted a short way to gesture at the subsequent "tasks that are fast for someone but not for you are interesting," and did not mean it as a gotcha on METR, but I should've taken a second longer and pasted what they said rather than doing the "presumably a human competent at the task" handwave that I did.
Re:Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Tasks: Opus 4.5 has... by nightshift1 on Sunday December 21, 2025 @04:32AM (#46343489)
I agree. After all, benchmarks don't mean much, but I guess they are fine as long as they keep measuring the same thing every time. Also, the context matter. In my case, I see a huge difference between the gains at work vs those at home on a personal project where I don't have to worry about corporate policies, security, correctness, standards, etc. I can let the LLM fly and not worry about losing my job in record time.