News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Introducing the Redesigned Bitbucket. Parent comment

Re:Introducing the Redesigned Bitbucket by csomar on Tuesday October 09, 2012 @02:36PM (#4633230)
I think it's targeted to startups who want to do costs savings. As they'll probably retain them when they grow, the pricing goes 180 times more expensive for the next plan. It's still a lot cheaper than Github, though.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Introducing the Redesigned Bitbucket by mkchandler on Tuesday October 09, 2012 @09:39PM (#4634699)
We recently moved to GitHub Enterprise and it really is not as expensive as it looks. It is $250/year per developer... not really that much considering what you get. Plus it is a virtual server provided for us, so we just have to upload software upgrade packages to get the latest updates. We didn't have to spend the money on someone to set up all of the MySql, Redis, Solr, etc. services to get it running. So honestly I consider GitHub Enterprise to be quite a cost savings. Just a counterpoint...

EDIT: We are not a startup, but still something to consider.

[ Parent | on HN ]