News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Engineers who dismiss AI by stemlord on Friday December 19, 2025 @10:13AM (#46326717)
But Claude Code costs money. You really want to introduce a critical dependency into your workflow that will simultaneously atrophy your skills and charge you subscription fees?
Re:Engineers who dismiss AI by tjr on Friday December 19, 2025 @10:58AM (#46327221)
It's also proprietary software running on someone else's machine. All other arguments for or against aside, I am surprised that so many people are okay with this. Not in a one-time use sense, necessarily, but to have long-term plans that this is what programming will be from here on out.
Re:Engineers who dismiss AI by oxag3n on Friday December 19, 2025 @12:14PM (#46328276)
Another issue with it is IP protection. It reminded me stories where the moment physical manufacturing was outsourced to China, exact clones appeared shortly after.

Imagine investing tons of efforts and money into a startup, just to get a clone a week after launch, or worse - before your launch.

Re:Engineers who dismiss AI by stemlord on Friday December 19, 2025 @11:39AM (#46327764)
Right, we the workers are giving away control over the future of general purpose computation to the power elite, unless we reject the institutionalization of remote access proprietary tooling like this
Re:Engineers who dismiss AI by jennyholzer2 on Friday December 19, 2025 @10:46AM (#46327076)
this is why I say "AI is for idiots"
Re:Engineers who dismiss AI by dwaltrip on Friday December 19, 2025 @02:00PM (#46329551)
Any new useful tool must be managed in a way so that one isn’t overly dependent on it.

- google maps

- power tools

- complex js frameworks

- ORMs

- the electrical grid (outages are a thing)

- and so on…

This isn’t a new problem unique to LLMs.

Practice using the tool intelligently and responsibly, and also work to maintain your ability to function without when needed.