News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LLJS: Low-Level JavaScript by judofyr on Tuesday October 09, 2012 @08:53AM (#4631212)
Ehm, it's valid JavaScript. What is not "regular" about it?
Re:LLJS: Low-Level JavaScript by djhworld on Tuesday October 09, 2012 @09:23AM (#4631330)
He probably meant to say "readable"
Re:LLJS: Low-Level JavaScript by evincarofautumn on Tuesday October 09, 2012 @10:36AM (#4631703)
Generated code rarely is. The compiler I maintain at work had “readable output” as one of its early goals. That was abandoned around when we started adding optimisations.