Re:Ty: A fast Python type checker and LSP
by dcre on Tuesday December 16, 2025 @07:49PM
(#46296855)
I think the idea is not that there are features that aren’t listed, but rather that if a typechecker supports 10 features people care about and is missing 10 that people don’t really use, it will look a lot worse on a list like this than a typechecker with 100% compliance, when in practice it may not really be worse at all.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.