Re:Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo
by netdevphoenix on Tuesday December 16, 2025 @11:51AM
(#46290884)
The wider point here is that you can only use FF as long as Mozilla can fund it and Mozilla can only fund it as long as Google funds them. At some point, it will be cheaper for Google to pay monopoly fines than funding Mozilla.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo
by SoftTalker on Tuesday December 16, 2025 @12:05PM
(#46291060)
Fines aren't a way to just buy your way out of obeying the law. At some point if they persist in monopolistic activities then they will get broken up.
Re:Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo
by WorldPeas on Tuesday December 16, 2025 @12:53PM
(#46291737)
I don't think the FTC prioritizes that right now
Re:Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo
by DaSHacka on Tuesday December 16, 2025 @04:30PM
(#46294797)
I don't think they've prioritized that ever in recent memory, or they would have already been broken up a long time ago.
Re:Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo
by netdevphoenix on Friday December 19, 2025 @04:41AM
(#46323953)
The last time that happened was almost half a century ago afaik. I highly doubt Big Tech entities will get broken up in our lifetime
Re:Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo
by lelanthran on Tuesday December 16, 2025 @01:10PM
(#46291997)
There's penalties other than fines for abusive monopolies.
Fines are only the slightest punishment.
Re:Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo
by mghackerlady on Wednesday December 17, 2025 @01:08PM
(#46303186)
I can't remember the last time a monopoly got punished properly