Memory Safety in C# vs. Rust

Re:Memory Safety in C# vs. Rust by jasonthorsness on Tuesday December 16, 2025 @11:13AM (#46290367)

This isn't true at all anymore for years! Microsoft acknowledged Linux won for server-side and since C# is primarily used as a server-side language they made everything work incredibly well on Linux.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Memory Safety in C# vs. Rust by runjake on Tuesday December 16, 2025 @11:18AM (#46290440)

I find that modern versions of dotnet seem to run better on Linux. And from what I see from Azure and from MSFT engineer blog posts, I'm assuming dotnet support on Linux is a higher priority than on Windows.

In any case, their claim that dotnet is a bad framework made me chuckle out loud. I'd like to see their impression of what a better framework looks like.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Memory Safety in C# vs. Rust by QuiCasseRien on Tuesday December 16, 2025 @02:53PM (#46293533)

I have the same result : performances on Linux are better and this is a real focus for MSFT engineer (Azure has a tons of linux instances running dotnet)

[ Parent | on HN ]