Re:In Defense of Matlab Code
by drnick1 on Tuesday December 16, 2025 @12:53AM
(#46285250)
The C++ devs at your firm must be absolutely terrible if a newcomer using a scripting language can write faster software, or you are not telling the whole story. All of NumPy, Julia, MATLAB, R, and similar domain-specific, user-friendly libraries and platforms use BLAS and LAPACK for numerical calculations under the hood with some overhead depending on the implementation, so a reasonably optimized native implementation should always be faster. By the looks of it the C++ code wasn't compiled with -O3 if it can be trivially beaten by Julia.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:In Defense of Matlab Code
by SatvikBeri on Tuesday December 16, 2025 @11:40AM
(#46290733)
Are you aware that Julia is a compiled language with a heavy focus on performance? It is not in the same category as NumPy/MATLAB/R
Re:In Defense of Matlab Code
by postflopclarity on Tuesday December 16, 2025 @05:16PM
(#46295370)
Julia is not a scripting language and can match C performance on many tasks.