News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GPT-5.2 by jasonlotito on Thursday December 11, 2025 @03:18PM (#46236591)
FTA: Both models make clear mistakes, but GPT‑5.2 shows better comprehension of the image.

You can find it right next to the image you are talking about.

Re:GPT-5.2 by tedsanders on Thursday December 11, 2025 @03:40PM (#46236847)
To be fair to OP, I just added this to our blog after their comment, in response to the correct criticisms that our text didn't make it clear how bad GPT-5.2's labels are.

LLMs have always been very subhuman at vision, and GPT-5.2 continues in this tradition, but it's still a big step up over GPT-5.1.

One way to get a sense of how bad LLMs are at vision is to watch them play Pokemon. E.g.,: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/u6Lacc7wx4yYkBQ3r/insights-i...

They still very much struggle with basic vision tasks that adults, kids, and even animals can ace with little trouble.

Re:GPT-5.2 by da_grift_shift on Thursday December 11, 2025 @04:00PM (#46237091)
'Commented after article was already edited in response to HN feedback' award