News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Retina Revolution - smaller images with better quality by ck2 on Sunday October 07, 2012 @11:09AM (#4623455)
On web sized progressive, the loading is over quickly and the benefit is an immediate placeholder on even slower connections instead of whitespace.

But the real reason is it also produces smaller file sizes.

Re:Retina Revolution - smaller images with better quality by oofabz on Sunday October 07, 2012 @11:24AM (#4623491)
Progressive JPEGs are not smaller. They contain the same data, just rearranged. You can losslessly transform a progressive JPEG into a baseline JPEG and vice versa, without recompressing it. The jpegtran tool, included with the standard JPEG library, can do this.
Re:Retina Revolution - smaller images with better quality by revertts on Sunday October 07, 2012 @11:47AM (#4623530)
Larger images saved as pjpegs tend to be slightly smaller than a standard jpeg.

http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/2008/12/05/imageopt-4/

Re:Retina Revolution - smaller images with better quality by ars on Sunday October 07, 2012 @12:17PM (#4623591)
If you actually try it using the tool you yourself mentioned you'll see that progressive JPEG's are in fact smaller.
Re:Retina Revolution - smaller images with better quality by FrankBooth on Sunday October 07, 2012 @04:06PM (#4624271)
Stream compression benefits from locality of data, so the ability to merely rearrange data can be quite beneficial.