> We have always agreed that a natural language compiler is theoretically possible.
No. Nobody here except you agrees with this. The distinction between natural languages and formal languages exists for a reason.
No. Nobody here except you agrees with this. The distinction between natural languages and formal languages exists for a reason.
We have always agreed that a natural language compiler is theoretically possible. Is a natural language translation program the same as a natural language compiler, or do you see some kind of difference? If so, what is the difference?