Re:Rahm Emanuel says U.S. should follow Australia's youth so...
by SilverElfin on Tuesday December 09, 2025 @10:48PM
(#46213857)
Why shouldn’t parents mind their own children? Why limit everyone’s speech?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Rahm Emanuel says U.S. should follow Australia's youth so...
by abraae on Tuesday December 09, 2025 @10:58PM
(#46213929)
Do you have kids?
It's much easier to say to a child "you can't have a social media account, it's the law because experts have determined it's not healthy at your age" than "your mother and I think that social media is bad for you".
Re:Rahm Emanuel says U.S. should follow Australia's youth so...
by pyuser583 on Tuesday December 09, 2025 @11:50PM
(#46214209)
I tried that before they were 13. Technically false, but almost no social media company allows under 13s.
It didn’t work very well.
Re:Rahm Emanuel says U.S. should follow Australia's youth so...
by amanaplanacanal on Wednesday December 10, 2025 @07:16AM
(#46216876)
Whether experts have determined it's not healthy is independent from whether it's against the law.
Re:Rahm Emanuel says U.S. should follow Australia's youth so...
by DaSHacka on Wednesday December 10, 2025 @09:13AM
(#46217910)
Whether it's the rules of the parents, or the
"rules" of the government, they're all the same in the eyes of a child.
source: was once a child
Re:Rahm Emanuel says U.S. should follow Australia's youth so...
by liveoneggs on Wednesday December 10, 2025 @03:00PM
(#46222896)
Re:Rahm Emanuel says U.S. should follow Australia's youth so...
by Terr_ on Wednesday December 10, 2025 @08:40PM
(#46226629)
A true observation, but not sufficient to criminalize and infringe on basically everybody else.
There are all sorts of things that would be easier for parents to prohibit if the government made it illegal: Popular toys, M&M's, pork, anything that questions the bible...