Deep dive on Nvidia circular funding

Re:Deep dive on Nvidia circular funding by johnecheck on Monday December 08, 2025 @03:40PM (#46197357)

> Even if the conclusion is broadly correct, that doesn't mean the reasoning used to get there is consistent.

This is the conclusion of a reply that focused entirely on critiquing OP's style/AI use instead of their reasoning? Ironic.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Deep dive on Nvidia circular funding by throw234678 on Monday December 08, 2025 @03:47PM (#46197448)

Poe's Law strikes again!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Deep dive on Nvidia circular funding by ip26 on Monday December 08, 2025 @07:45PM (#46199881)

If someone generates a ten thousand word slop essay with AI, do I have a moral obligation to critique its reasoning step by step instead of merely pointing out its origin?

If I do, it just so happens I have a ten thousand word rebuttal for you…

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Deep dive on Nvidia circular funding by johnecheck on Tuesday December 09, 2025 @12:31AM (#46201570)

If someone generates a massive essay with AI, you don't have a moral obligation to do anything.

If you want to argue that the reasoning in the essay is incorrect, I do expect you to refute the reasoning instead of merely attacking the source.

[ Parent | on HN ]