News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AI should only run as fast as we can catch up by Aldipower on Monday December 08, 2025 @12:59PM (#46195474)
Sounds inhuman.
Re:AI should only run as fast as we can catch up by quantummagic on Monday December 08, 2025 @01:05PM (#46195561)
As an industry, we've been doing the same thing to people in almost every other sector of the workforce, since we began. Automation is just starting to come for us now, and a lot of us are really pissed off about it. All of a sudden, we're humanitarians.
Re:AI should only run as fast as we can catch up by Terr_ on Monday December 08, 2025 @02:24PM (#46196483)
> Automation is just starting to come for us now

This argument is common and facile: Software development has always been about "automating ourselves out of a job", whether in the broad sense of creating compilers and IDEs, or in the individual sense that you write some code and say: "Hey, I don't want to rewrite this again later, not even if I was being paid for my time, I'll make it into a reusable library."

> the same thing

The reverse: What pisses me off is how what's coming is not the same thing.

Customers are being sold a snake-oil product, and its adoption may well ruin things we've spent careers de-crappifying by making them consistent and repeatable and understandable. In the aftermath, some portion of my (continued) career will be diverted to cleaning up the lingering damage from it.

Re:AI should only run as fast as we can catch up by A4ET8a8uTh0_v2 on Monday December 08, 2025 @01:03PM (#46195538)
Nah, sounds like management, but I am repeating myself. In all seriousness, I have found myself having to carefully rein some of similar decisions in. I don't want to get into details, but there are times I wonder if they understand how things really work or if people need some 'floor' level exposure before they just decree stuff.