Re:Perpetual Futures
by block_dagger on Friday December 05, 2025 @06:00PM
(#46168534)
This comment makes sweeping generalizations.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Perpetual Futures
by throw101010 on Friday December 05, 2025 @08:04PM
(#46169490)
This is a common place in any thread about cryptocurrencies on HN unfortunately... I could be convinced of my own message also being a sweeping generalization if anyone can point out a single post where top comments aren't doing exactly this when it comes to this topic, even the technical ones.
Re:Perpetual Futures
by petesergeant on Saturday December 06, 2025 @02:58AM
(#46171503)
This is a useless comment for most readers (myself included!) unless you specify what you think those sweeping generalizations are, and why you think they're unsound.