Re:Thoughts on Go vs. Rust vs. Zig
by afiori on Friday December 05, 2025 @12:32AM
(#46157126)
It they had not messed up async it would be much better
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Thoughts on Go vs. Rust vs. Zig
by ViewTrick1002 on Friday December 05, 2025 @02:43AM
(#46157749)
Given the constraints I still haven’t seen an asynchronous proposal for Rust that would do things differently.
Keep in mind that one requirement is being able to create things like Embassy.
I agree, I think they should have delayed it.
In a different universe rust still does not have async and in 5 years it might get an ocaml-style effect system.
Re:Thoughts on Go vs. Rust vs. Zig
by ViewTrick1002 on Friday December 05, 2025 @04:22AM
(#46158822)
And in that universe Rust is likely an inconsequential niche language.
If rust skipped async features I think it would not have damaged it much
Re:Thoughts on Go vs. Rust vs. Zig
by ViewTrick1002 on Friday December 05, 2025 @10:23AM
(#46162476)
Almost the entire early large scale adoption came from people writing async web services.
From 2023:
> In that regard, async/await has been phenomenally successful. Many of the most prominent sponsors of the Rust Foundation, especially those who pay developers, depend on async/await to write high performance network services in Rust as one of their primary use cases that justify their funding.