Re:Tunnl.gg
by klipitkas on Thursday December 04, 2025 @07:34AM
(#46146942)
Thanks for the kind words. I hope I won't have to close this service in a few days due to abuse but its a weird world we live in.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tunnl.gg
by pcthrowaway on Thursday December 04, 2025 @09:09AM
(#46147818)
Do you have funding to cover the paying the bandwidth costs which will ultimately result from this? Or if you're running this from a home network, does anyone know if OP should be concerned of running into issues with their ISP?
The tunnel host appears to be a Hetzner server, they are pretty generous with bandwidth but the interesting thing I learned about doing some scalability improvements at a similar company [0] is that for these proxy systems, each direction’s traffic is egress bandwidth. Good luck OP, the tool looks cool. Kinda like pinggy.
I can cover hundreds of PB of bandwidth per month if needed without paying a fortune.
Can you share more details? I know Hetzner offers unlimited bandwidth in some cases but I thought it limited only to servers with the 1Gbs uplink
Re:Tunnl.gg
by aamoscodes on Thursday December 04, 2025 @05:29PM
(#46154057)
Work closet /s
As someone who has launched something free on HN before, the resulting signups were around 1/3rd valid users doing cool things and checking things out, and 2/3rds nefarious users.
a bit better benevolent:malicious ratio than the real world
2/3rds of people in the world are malicious?
2/3 of resources will typically be spent by malicious/nefarious/abusive users.
[edit] for clarity
Dare I ask how much bandwidth it is consuming?
Its around 700MB today so far.
Re:Tunnl.gg
by patricklorio on Thursday December 04, 2025 @05:18PM
(#46153916)
I run playit.gg. Abuse is a big problem on our free tier. I’d get https://github.com/projectdiscovery/nuclei setup to scan your online endpoints and autoban detections of c2 servers.
Thanks for sharing this. I run packetriot.com, another tunneling service and I ended up writing my own scanner for endpoints using keyword lists I gathered from various infosec resources.
I had done some account filtering for origins coming out of Tor, VPN networks, data centers, etc. but I recently dropped those and added an portal page for free accounts, similar to what ngrok does.
It was very effective at preventing abuse. I also added mechanism for reporting abuse on the safety page that's presented.
Re:Tunnl.gg
by patricklorio on Friday December 05, 2025 @12:17PM
(#46164233)
Have you found a way to detect xworm c2c servers?
Our services were used for C2 as well. I investigated it a bit but eventually decided to just drop TCP forwarding from our free-tier and that reduced our abuse/malware reports for C2 over TCP to zero essentially.
One path I looked at was to use the VirusTotal API to help identify C2's that other security organizations were identifying and leverage that to automatically take down malicious TCP endpoints. I wrote some POCs but did not deploy them. It's something I plan on taking up again at some point next year.
Re:Tunnl.gg
by patricklorio on Monday December 08, 2025 @02:45PM
(#46196705)
Want to chat on discord? Maybe we could combine efforts to try and stop people abusing our services :). We have a few vendors sending us automated reports, maybe I could open it up for multiple projects.
feel free to give me a ping on https://discord.gg/AXAbujx @patrick.