News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tunnl.gg by keepamovin on Thursday December 04, 2025 @07:19AM (#46146826)
I have a demo with working GitHub runner workflow code here: https://github.com/BrowserBox/ariadne

Specifically: https://github.com/BrowserBox/ariadne/blob/f07e3b0d445f5d4a8...

Re:Tunnl.gg by kilobaud on Thursday December 04, 2025 @04:07PM (#46153080)
Hey if you are interested in re-using any of this GitHub Action, feel free to: https://github.com/LocalXpose/localxpose-action
Re:Tunnl.gg by keepamovin on Thursday December 04, 2025 @11:16PM (#46156790)
Thank you bud, was not aware of local expose. There’s a bunch of these tunneling services out there, what makes yours uniquely cool?
Re:Tunnl.gg by kilobaud on Friday December 05, 2025 @01:41PM (#46165404)
Probably not an exciting answer but my work focused on stability and performance. There are indeed a lot of cool alternatives. I think Localxpose is for businesses who aren't interested in self-hosting and just need a service that will reliably handle production traffic. I don't know if that's unique (or cool, lol)
Re:Tunnl.gg by keepamovin on Wednesday December 10, 2025 @12:19AM (#46214352)
Alrighty, well I might through it into the BrowserBox mix. We are currently using a variety of tunnels for punching through network layers and providing networking flexibility.