News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reverse engineering a $1B Legal AI tool exposed 100k+ con... by kylecazar on Wednesday December 03, 2025 @01:16PM (#46137930)
If they have a billion dollar valuation, this fairly basic (and irresponsible) vulnerability could have cost them a billion dollars. If someone with malice had been in your shoes, in that industry, this probably wouldn't have been recoverable. Imagine a firm's entire client communications and discovery posted online.

They should have given you some money.

Re:Reverse engineering a $1B Legal AI tool exposed 100k+ con... by edm0nd on Wednesday December 03, 2025 @02:10PM (#46138609)
Exactly.

They could have sold this to a ransomare group or affiliate for 5-6 figures and then the ransomware group could have exfil'd the data and attempted to extort the company for millions.

Then if they didnt pay and the ransomware group leaked the info to the public, they'd likely have to spend millions on lawsuits and fines anyways.

They should have paid this dude 5-6 figures for this find. It's scenarios like this that lead people to sell these vulns on the gray/black market instead of traditional bug bounty whitehat routes.

Re:Reverse engineering a $1B Legal AI tool exposed 100k+ con... by RagnarD on Wednesday December 03, 2025 @01:34PM (#46138161)
They should have given him a LOT of money.
Re:Reverse engineering a $1B Legal AI tool exposed 100k+ con... by DonHopkins on Wednesday December 03, 2025 @05:46PM (#46141335)
Would you settle for a LOT of free AI generated legal advice? ;)
Re:Reverse engineering a $1B Legal AI tool exposed 100k+ con... by Tepix on Thursday December 04, 2025 @04:10AM (#46145426)
Who says they didn't give him money?
Re:Reverse engineering a $1B Legal AI tool exposed 100k+ con... by zain37 on Thursday December 04, 2025 @10:28AM (#46148706)
I reckon he would've mentioned it if he got a bounty, 100% deserves the bag