News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Are we repeating the telecoms crash with AI datacenters? by mNovak on Wednesday December 03, 2025 @01:16PM (#46137923)
Of all the players, I'd argue Google certainly knows how to give away a product for free and still make money.

The local open source argument doesn't hold water for me -- why does anyone buy Windows, Dropbox, etc when there's free alternatives?

Re:Are we repeating the telecoms crash with AI datacenters? by bee_rider on Wednesday December 03, 2025 @03:05PM (#46139333)
Not many people buy Windows, they buy laptops that happen to have Windows installed. IMO this is a worthwhile distinction because most people don’t really care about operating systems anyway, and would happily (I suspect, at least) use an Open Source one if it came installed and configured on a device that they got in a store.

Installing an OS is seen as a hard/technical task still. Installing a local program, not so much. I suspect people install LLM programs from app stores without knowing if they are calling out to the internet or running locally.

Re:Are we repeating the telecoms crash with AI datacenters? by steveBK123 on Wednesday December 03, 2025 @02:12PM (#46138628)
Yes, it seems to me their strategy is to watch the OpenAI, Anthropics, etc of the world bleed themselves to death.
Re:Are we repeating the telecoms crash with AI datacenters? by lelanthran on Thursday December 04, 2025 @07:30AM (#46146910)
> why does anyone buy Windows, Dropbox, etc when there's free alternatives?

No one buys Windows - it comes with the PC.

If people were shipped blank computers and told to order the OS separately, they wouldn't be buying Windows at the current price point.