Accepting US car standards would risk European lives

Re:Accepting US car standards would risk European lives by netsharc on Wednesday December 03, 2025 @03:42AM (#46131873)

Huh, but this is a terrible comparison.. the cars in both unions have been made the same, of course they cost similarly. In other words the US buyers partially pay for the R&D cost to keep to EU standards. And the US population also get the EU regulated-safety requirements (although only partially, since the US also allows Cybertrucks to drive around).

A comparison would be comparing a car that can ensure the survival of their passengers, proven with test crashes, vs e.g. Chinese-made cara for the local market that have terrible crumpling when crash-tested..

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Accepting US car standards would risk European lives by ricardobeat on Wednesday December 03, 2025 @04:35AM (#46132346)

A bit off-topic, but lots of the top ranked Euro NCAP crash tests have been chinese-built cars for a few years now. Their industry has evolved insanely fast, that perception of low standards is long gone.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Accepting US car standards would risk European lives by seszett on Wednesday December 03, 2025 @04:37AM (#46132380)

> the cars in both unions have been made the same, of course they cost similarly

I'm really not sure what you mean, many of the most popular cars in the EU aren't even sold in the US (Renault, Dacia, Opel, Peugeot/Citroën although they have taken quite a hit in the last few years) and they are generally cheaper than US cars.

And quite a few US cars aren't available in the EU either (although they can sometimes be imported privately, which bypasses the regulations somewhat) which is the very topic we're discussing.

As for Chinese cars, the recent ones are performing adequately in crash-tests.

[ Parent | on HN ]