News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GitHub to Codeberg: My Experience by icy on Monday December 01, 2025 @09:41AM (#46107981)
Not really. It's very open for everyone to participate. Further, Bluesky has been working on standardizing AT at the IETF [0][1]. They have also made a patent non-agression pledge: https://bsky.social/about/blog/10-01-2025-patent-pledge

In short, they're actively working on making AT as neutral as possible.

[0]: https://docs.bsky.app/blog/taking-at-to-ietf

[1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bofreq-newbold-authenticate...

Re:GitHub to Codeberg: My Experience by zenmac on Wednesday December 10, 2025 @08:36AM (#46217554)
We have already talked about this. In the end it comes down the index for the instances that bsky maintain it will inevitably be the dominate ones vs others who run AT Pro.

It would be all good if the index is shared via DHT, bittorrent, ips or other means. Same goes for the google search index, etc.

Re:GitHub to Codeberg: My Experience by jcgl on Wednesday December 10, 2025 @05:00PM (#46224506)
You're talking about Bluesky's ATProto instance (term.?). Other commenter is talking about ATProto as a protocol.