Re:Putting the Brakes on High Frequency Trading
by rdm70 on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @10:20PM
(#4610607)
Unintended consequences alert: read up on the UK stamp duty on UK equity trades. Goldman Sachs creates a derivative security matching the return of the underlying equity that you can trade with GS and avoid paying the stamp duty. Net result: GS makes money, less liquidity for the average investor. Rock on transaction taxes.
Re:Putting the Brakes on High Frequency Trading
by moe on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @11:05PM
(#4610711)
Goldman Sachs creates a derivative security matching the return of the underlying equity
So Goldman Sachs is using a loophole, how surprising.
What is your point, though? Should we not make laws that can potentially have loopholes?
Re:Putting the Brakes on High Frequency Trading
by NelsonMinar on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @09:31PM
(#4610514)
The European Union is seriously considering adding a 0.1% tax against trades in stocks and bonds (and an 0.01% tax on derivatives). It would definitely curb HFT, and there's talk of it also generating needed revenue. The main criticism is that a transaction tax distorts the market in hard to predict ways, and that big players may work around it. The English Wikipedia article has a decent summary of the proposal status: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union_financial_transa...
Re:Putting the Brakes on High Frequency Trading
by superprime on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @09:09PM
(#4610458)
It's not really his idea, but it's probably a good one. I remembered it as being called a Tobin tax, but that really only applies to currency exchange. Instead, it's just a securities transaction tax: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_transaction_tax#Secur... .
No more problem. And it could be harder to game than taxing profits after the fact...