Re:RL is more information inefficient than you thought
by sidibe on Sunday November 30, 2025 @12:13PM
(#46098459)
Ok so now it's stupid or malicious to use RL as reinforcement learning on a blog about AI where everyone in the field has been referring to it as RL forever? Even wikipedia puts (RL) after reinforcement learning.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:RL is more information inefficient than you thought
by gpvos on Tuesday December 02, 2025 @04:30AM
(#46119349)
That's the normal way to introduce an acronym in an article.
Anyway, I was just saying that however irritating, it's likely just an omission out of forgetfulness, not deliberate clickbait. A minor application of Hanlon's razor.
Seeing the downvotes and even a flag, it appears I'll have to lower my expectation of people's cultural baggage here.
Re:RL is more information inefficient than you thought
by gpvos on Monday December 15, 2025 @08:16AM
(#46274099)
Additionally, replying to "in the field" in GP: this is about the article title. You first have to know which field the article is in, which simply is not clear if you are an HN reader that happens to not be in that field.