Samsung claims Apple patent verdict tainted by jury foreman

Re:Samsung claims Apple patent verdict tainted by jury foreman by tedunangst on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @05:24PM (#4609734)

Have you ever clicked a Wikipedia citation? Half they time they don't support, or even contradict, the article's claims. Groklaw isn't Wikipedia, but they idea that an article with citations is infallible is ludicrous. People misrepresent, either intentionally or accidentally, what they've read all the time.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Samsung claims Apple patent verdict tainted by jury foreman by parfe on Thursday October 04, 2012 @12:45AM (#4610928)

Are you claiming Groklaw fabricates court PDFs?

Otherwise,what the F did you just post?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Samsung claims Apple patent verdict tainted by jury foreman by sbuk on Thursday October 04, 2012 @07:20AM (#4611773)

I don't think they are claiming that at all. They are questioning Groklaw's unabashed partisanship. The thing that I find utterly absurd about these discussion is the partisanship that goes on. The Google and Android faithful are particularly bad in this area. They will call articles that disagree with their world view biased, yet an article that does is undeniable and unquestionable.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Samsung claims Apple patent verdict tainted by jury foreman by tedunangst on Thursday October 04, 2012 @01:50PM (#4613451)

The F: Groklaw's summary of the PDF may be less than 100% accurate.

[ Parent | on HN ]