News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Chainalysis Successful Deanonymization Attack on Monero by krior on Saturday November 29, 2025 @01:54PM (#46089825)
I don't know what asking AI adds to the discussion.
Re:Chainalysis Successful Deanonymization Attack on Monero by ianbutler on Saturday November 29, 2025 @01:57PM (#46089851)
Well reading comprehension tells us they were surprised that most monero folks run their own nodes and that they were unable to find supporting information.

Your comment however does actually add nothing.

Re:Chainalysis Successful Deanonymization Attack on Monero by wizzwizz4 on Saturday November 29, 2025 @03:58PM (#46090727)
No, reading comprehension tells us that Claude Opus output the "unable to find supporting information" claim, which abecedarius faithfully relayed to us. There's no evidence in the text that suggests abecedarius attempted to find supporting information.
Re:Chainalysis Successful Deanonymization Attack on Monero by ianbutler on Saturday November 29, 2025 @05:26PM (#46091391)
Okay and if they had said Google we wouldn't be doing this dance, people just hate AI and its obnoxious to see comments about it on HN all the time. On a crypto post no less.

We get it you guys don't like AI, next!

It is equally obnoxious to people who talk about AI for everything as if it is a savior, it's a tool use it or don't.

Re:Chainalysis Successful Deanonymization Attack on Monero by abecedarius on Saturday November 29, 2025 @10:21PM (#46093324)
It was a form of "huh, interesting. I tried to quickly find some more evidence for this but failed."

If Claude as search engine were able to link to some backing (maybe like "we estimate around n nodes regularly joining the network, which roughly matches the order of magnitude of estimated users" ) -- that'd be great! I'd have said I was surprised but look what I found.

Instead:

- it couldn't dig up anything supporting, except that Monero sites encourage users to run their own node;

- one point it raised against was confirmed by another reply to my comment ("apps like CakeWallet, where their node is used and assumed as trustworthy"). (Claude listed the same and a couple more wallets it called "popular" with similar trust dependence.)

I agree with GP that just relaying a chatbot is rude. That's why I didn't do that.