News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Samsung claims Apple patent verdict tainted by jury foreman. Parent comment

Re:Samsung claims Apple patent verdict tainted by jury foreman by josephlord on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @01:50PM (#4608685)
Is it not possible that he didn't know that Seagate was owned by Samsung (I didn't)? Or at least not blame them for the actions of Seagate nearly 20 years ago.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Samsung claims Apple patent verdict tainted by jury foreman by vidarh on Thursday October 04, 2012 @05:33AM (#4611548)
It would have been a lot easier to believe that if he hadn't now a couple of times insisted the question was limited to ten years, in direct contradiction of the transcript, and have lashed out at Samsung and insinuated they intentionally got him on the jury to use this to get a retrial.

His reaction makes me question his credibility. But of course it is possible that he genuinely didn't know.

[ Parent | on HN ]