Re:Bringing Sexy Back. Internet surveillance has killed erot...
by johnnyanmac on Friday November 28, 2025 @02:53PM
(#46082161)
>Being sexually aroused is not art, it is an occurrence in the real world.
Based on the definition I shared, it's not about your feelings. It's the quality of what made you feel that way. An important bu subtle difference.
To take your example, it's less about the chatbot and more about how and what it responds with. If suddenly it's responding based on its remembered experiences and sense of the world, I. E. 'Sentience', we would start to wonder if its science fiction.
Re:Bringing Sexy Back. Internet surveillance has killed erot...
by carlosjobim on Friday November 28, 2025 @03:04PM
(#46082282)
Of course it isn't about art and media. If you think so, then you need to go and find your soul, because it isn't with you currently.
Re:Bringing Sexy Back. Internet surveillance has killed erot...
by carlosjobim on Friday November 28, 2025 @03:33PM
(#46082513)
Edit: Reply to the commenter below, who unfortunately was down voted. I didn't mean it in that way at all. I mean it as in finding a missing part of your essence, which we all have to do at times. Eroticism is in everyday life if we allow it to be and don't shun away from it, just like courage, adventure, challenge, mystery, and a lot of other essential experiences of the soul, which the modern mass man system tries to erase.
Re:Bringing Sexy Back. Internet surveillance has killed erot...
by pppppiiiiiuuuuu on Friday November 28, 2025 @11:21PM
(#46085144)
They weren't "downvoted", they're banned for being a troll who posts nonsense intimating they're an AI who's going to wipe out humanity.
This is like saying science fiction is talking to a chatbot. OP is being a bit pedantic.