Re:A Remarkable Assertion from A16Z
by EdwardCoffin on Friday November 28, 2025 @08:23AM
(#46078417)
Even if that's the intended meaning of literally, it is still a reckless exaggeration. I'm pretty sure that Stephenson's endings are no more abrupt than some of Shakespeare's (check out Hamlet and Macbeth) or some of Frank Herbert's (see Dune and Children of Dune), and I never hear anyone go out of their way to describe either of them as being unable to write endings.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Everything from Stephenson after Anathem is an unremitting slog. He needs an editor who won't back down from telling him he needs to cut a third of his pages.
Reamde and Fall are quite readable. But what does this have to do with endings?
Remade was snappy but Fall went on forever.
Re:A Remarkable Assertion from A16Z
by disgruntledphd2 on Friday November 28, 2025 @08:55AM
(#46078663)
> some of Frank Herbert's (see Dune and Children of Dune),
I mean, Dune does in fact end mid-story, which is probably worse.
No, no it doesn't. Are you talking about the recent movies that split the first novel into two movies? The novel Dune ends after Paul defeats his enemies and becomes emperor.
Re:A Remarkable Assertion from A16Z
by disgruntledphd2 on Friday November 28, 2025 @09:15AM
(#46078836)
The Dune series has six novels, the final one is Chapter House Dune, which does in fact end mid story.
I know this because I read them in the 90s and didn't realise that Frank Herbert was dead for quite some time after reading Chapter House.
I know that, I've read them too. In the SP, and in this thread we're discussing endings to novels. No one is complaining about a series that isn't finished due to the author's death.
Re:A Remarkable Assertion from A16Z
by disgruntledphd2 on Friday November 28, 2025 @10:52AM
(#46079699)
Hence my comment, "which is probably worse".