News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on AGI is not possible even in 10 years.

Re:AGI is not possible even in 10 years by danslo on Thursday November 27, 2025 @08:53AM (#46069253)
This is slop right?

>This isn’t a minor gap; it’s a fundamental limitation.

>His timeline? At least a decade, probably much longer.

>What does that mean? Simply throwing more computing power and data at current models isn’t working anymore.

>His timeline for truly useful agents? About ten years.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AGI is not possible even in 10 years by dude250711 on Thursday November 27, 2025 @09:05AM (#46069364)
You can tell by the post history.

It's just like with the fake StackOverflow reputation and fake CodeProject articles in the past.

Same people at it again but super-charged.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AGI is not possible even in 10 years by firmretention on Thursday November 27, 2025 @02:06PM (#46072293)
Yup, clocked it in seconds. There's something especially perverse about reading AI slop waxing poetic about AI slop.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AGI is not possible even in 10 years by tim333 on Thursday November 27, 2025 @03:25PM (#46072951)
It has the logical inconsistency of good LLM slop like:

"AGI is not possible"

combined with

"Does this mean AI progress will stall? Absolutely not."

[ Parent | on HN ]