News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Extinct ibex is resurrected by cloning by ars on Saturday January 31, 2009 @11:21PM (#460512)
DNA is more complicated than that. I don't fully understand the process, but I believe it works like this:

You can't read the atoms in DNA one after the other and make a list. You chop the DNA into pieces and pattern match sections (fragments) against markers. Then you try to put fragments together by matching overlaps.

But if you have sections that repeat, or have a lot of the same atom over and over, you can't directly read those.

Usually when they say: "we published the DNA" they mean the "coding section" - those are the sections that can make proteins. But there is a lot more to DNA, non-coding, or junk DNA that can not be easily (or at all?) read.

So for the comment above yours, I think what they have is fragments, but no overlapping sections, so that can't put it together into a whole. It's not like a file with gaps - it's random pieces of it, of random lengths, in a random order.

Re:Extinct ibex is resurrected by cloning by gravitycop on Sunday February 01, 2009 @11:14AM (#460960)
You can't read the atoms in DNA one after the other and make a list.

Discrete units of information on DNA strands are not atoms. They are nucleotides or base pairs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleotide

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_pair

Re:Extinct ibex is resurrected by cloning by ars on Monday February 02, 2009 @12:16PM (#462536)
I know, I was just trying to keep things simple.

Or, you can use the other definition of atom: indivisible part, and an atom of DNA is it's smallest building block :)