Re:Trillions Spent and Big Software Projects Are Still Failing
by nradov on Tuesday November 25, 2025 @04:03PM
(#46050743)
Did they succeed because of Erlang or in spite of Erlang? We can't draw any reliable conclusions from a single data point. Maybe a different platform would have worked even better?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Trillions Spent and Big Software Projects Are Still Failing
by awesome_dude on Tuesday November 25, 2025 @04:37PM
(#46051105)
Yeah - the technology used is a seperate concern to their abilities as users (developers) of that technology and the effectiveness at handling the scale.
I, for example, have always said that I am more than capable of writing code in C that is several orders of magnitude SLOWER than what I could write in.. say Python.
My skillset would never be used as an example of the value of C for whatever
Re:Trillions Spent and Big Software Projects Are Still Failing
by HalcyonicStorm on Tuesday November 25, 2025 @08:46PM
(#46053223)
Erlang is uniquely suited to chat systems out of the box in a way that most other ecosystems aren't. Lightweight green threads via the BEAM vm, process scheduler so concurrent out of the box, immutable data structures, message passing as communication between processes.
Re:Trillions Spent and Big Software Projects Are Still Failing
by nradov on Wednesday November 26, 2025 @10:44AM
(#46058530)
There's nothing unique about Erlang. I have nothing against it but other companies have built messaging systems using other platforms that work as well or better than WhatsApp.
Re:Trillions Spent and Big Software Projects Are Still Failing
by aiisjustanif on Thursday November 27, 2025 @12:31AM
(#46066015)
Examples please.