Claude Opus 4.5

Re:Claude Opus 4.5 by zsoltkacsandi on Monday November 24, 2025 @05:03PM (#46039932)

I did not say that I only ran the prompt once per attempt. When I say that second time it failed it means that I spent hours to restart, clear context, giving hints, everything to help the model to produce something that works.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Claude Opus 4.5 by thomasfromcdnjs on Monday November 24, 2025 @11:11PM (#46042272)

You are really speaking to others points. Get a friend of yours to read what you are saying, it doesn't sound scientific in the slightest.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Claude Opus 4.5 by zsoltkacsandi on Tuesday November 25, 2025 @01:15AM (#46042837)

I never claimed this was a scientific study. It was an observation repeated over time. That is empirical in the plain meaning of the word.

Criticizing it for “not being scientific” is irrelevant, I didn’t present it as science. Are people only allowed to share experiences here if they come wrapped in a peer-reviewed paper?

If you want to debate the substance of the observation, happy to. But don’t rewrite what I said into a claim I never made.

[ Parent | on HN ]