Re:Google Revisits JPEG XL in Chromium After Earlier Removal
by jaffathecake on Monday November 24, 2025 @02:15PM
(#46037944)
Fwiw, JPEG XL takes around 2.5x the time to decode as an equivalent AVIF, and has worse compression https://jakearchibald.com/2025/present-and-future-of-progres...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google Revisits JPEG XL in Chromium After Earlier Removal
by eviks on Tuesday November 25, 2025 @12:34AM
(#46042657)
Interesting, looks like another opportunity for Chrome to avoid the Safari mistake
> slow. There's some suggestion that the Apple implementation is running on a single core, so maybe there's room for improvement.
Though their own old attempt was even worse
> of the old behind-a-flag Chromium JPEG XL decoder, and it's over 500% slower (6x) to decode than AVIF.