Re:Booking.com cancels $4K hotel reservation, offers same ro...
by Supermancho on Monday November 24, 2025 @10:45AM
(#46035343)
> This doesn’t make sense, how is your preferred range of attention expenditure even relevant?
This is an ironic statement, insofar as it's myopic.
The implication was clearly a monopoly by market availability (convenience), which is not a legal precept, but a sociological one. Comparing rates across all possible locales and vendors is impractical. This is part of what makes Amazon so successful. Sheer momentum.
Re:Booking.com cancels $4K hotel reservation, offers same ro...
by MichaelZuo on Monday December 01, 2025 @08:49PM
(#46116351)
And a dozen different HN users could also claim the same for their preferencez?
If a dozen different HN users expressed a dozen different preferred ranges… would there now have to be viable competitors at each possible step?