Re:Google Revisits JPEG XL in Chromium After Earlier Removal
by Ukv on Monday November 24, 2025 @06:22AM
(#46032848)
If the alternative was putting the information in some hypothetical file attribute with similar or greater level of support/availability (like for filtering across various search engines and file managers) then I'd agree there's no reason to keep it in the file extension in particular, but I feel the alternative here is just not really having it available in such a way at all (instead just an internal tag particular to the JXL format).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.