Re:CERN Council reviews feasibility study for a next-generat...
by sigmoid10 on Monday November 24, 2025 @10:53AM
(#46035426)
You seem to have mistaken this fact for an opinion (all too common for her followers unfortunately). Fortunately, you can easily look up everything I said. But sorry, I don't have time to make brainrot youtube videos for people with no relevant education and no attention span. If you didn't know these things before, you also won't learn them on youtube. And I actually still have real work to do.
Re:CERN Council reviews feasibility study for a next-generat...
by sylware on Tuesday November 25, 2025 @04:57AM
(#46044238)
Now you are a 20... or an AI. Come on...
Re:CERN Council reviews feasibility study for a next-generat...
by sigmoid10 on Tuesday November 25, 2025 @08:28AM
(#46045589)
Thank you for reinforcing my point. Even if you can't see it, anyone who reads this will.
Re:CERN Council reviews feasibility study for a next-generat...
by sylware on Thursday November 27, 2025 @05:58AM
(#46068061)
Of course, this sole HN comment is worth ten times more than a famous person making scientific videos on the internet... BTW, I wonder where is her mondo-meter at (aka "stuff" vs "model fixing").
We all know she has many enemies in the academics since targetting its funding... you are more likely to be one of them than anything else.
"Anyone who reads this will see it".
...
AI?
Re:CERN Council reviews feasibility study for a next-generat...
by sigmoid10 on Wednesday December 03, 2025 @12:37PM
(#46137438)
One comment. No. Countless scientific papers that have boiled into an accepted picture? Absolutely. But you won't hear about them if you only listen to one source on youtube who makes videos for non-scientists. Instead you'll see conspiracy everywhere. Like here somehow.
I hope you understand why...